Friday, December 30, 2005
Thursday, December 29, 2005
Can I Get A Duh!! From The Crowd. Cruise Irritates, Kids Medicate.
Wednesday, December 28, 2005
Looks Like I'm In Front Of The Curve: Rob Allyn's Treason
Face it, 99.9% of ILLEGALS do not pay federal, state, (Texas does not have state income tax) or local taxes, (water and gas bills excluded) so how can the Derbez statement above be true? It can't. But truth does not matter to Rob Allyn and his crew in this fight. It seems they are determined to see the U.S. destroyed simply because someone (or some government) will pay them enough money to commit treason.
I'd like to close with a few words from vdare.com. Link is to the entire article is here.
The words below draw parallels to the Texas revolution and what I see today as Mr. Allyn's ultimate mission: Destroy Texas, and other border states, for money. Linda Thom First, the American settlers had no great vision. They were folks who wanted land. My family members lost their land in Arkansas. They were farmers; they needed land. They settled at Washington on the Brazos where the Texas Declaration of Independence was signed. They had no part in it. They were just good people coming to Texas to work hard and support their families. Second, the Mexicans let in too many people in too short a time. Moreover, they did not protect their border with the United States and Americans illegally poured across the Louisiana border to get land, work hard and improve their lives. Third, the American settlers were not of the same beliefs and the same culture as the Mexicans and misunderstandings ultimately resulted in the hostilities. The Americans did not assimilate. There were so many of them. They did not become Catholics and, while they may have become Mexican citizens in name, they remained Americans at heart. And there are other lessons. The Mexican government was corrupt and unstable. Its people were poor and primitive. Some things have not changed. President Bush claims he is a Texan but many Texans declare that he is not. He is a rich Yankee from Connecticut who spent his vacations in Maine. Perhaps the President does not really know Texas history. That is too bad. President Bush continues to push for his Mexican guest worker amnesty because they are good, hardworking people who just want to have a better life and to do jobs Americans will not etc etc. Which is just what the Mexican elite told itself in the 1820s. If President Bush does know Texas history, he either cannot connect the dots—or, for some mysterious reason, he does not care. Mexico has played a large role in the history and culture in my part of the country. Nobody is questioning that. But the idea of not having a border (or fence in this case) is the same as saying we don't need a country. If Mr. Allyn and Mexico's Vicente Fox have their way, it looks like that is where we are headed... No identity, and no country.Thursday, December 22, 2005
Not Quite Sane
Wednesday, December 21, 2005
And To All A Good Night
Arthur Bianchi: Merry Christ's Mass
Simply put: MERRY CHRISTMAS! May God bless you and your family this season, and in the coming new year.Tuesday, December 20, 2005
Enough Already!
Story here By MARK STEVENSON Associated Press Writer Dec 20 3:23 PM US/Eastern MEXICO CITY - The Mexican government, angered by a U.S. proposal to extend a wall along the border to keep out migrants, has struck back with radio ads urging Mexican workers to denounce rights violations in the United States. What rights are they talking about? The right to come here ILLEGALLY? That's a right I haven't heard of. Facing a growing tide of anti-immigrant sentiment north of the border, the Mexican government is also hiring an American public relations firm to improve its image. The one thing I'll be sure to do, no matter what happens with the fence, is find out who else this company (Allyn and Company) represents and make sure those places never see a dime from me. Any American company that would take a job promoting ILLEGALS, promote breaking the law. That is not what I would call an American company.
http://www.allynco.com/ Allyn & Company has served more than 300 winning campaigns for heads of state, candidates, political parties and causes in the U.S., Mexico, the Caribbean and Asia. President Vicente Fox of Mexico. Three Mexican Governors. Prime Minister Perry Christie of the Bahamas. Award-winning creative for Governor George W. Bush. Independent advocacy TV ads in support of President Bush in 2000. Victories for the Republican Party, U.S. Senate, Congress, mayors and statewide offices. I'll make damn sure to voice my opposition to any Republican candidate who wishes to use Allyn's company. The above list makes me ill. My one little prayer is Bush has nothing to do with them now. But seeing how he wants to throw open the border, he might just hire them to push his policy. Idiot. Info on Allyn here: http://narconews.com/roballyn1.html The link shows how slimy this guy is. Mexican President Vicente Fox denounced the U.S. measures, passed by the House of Representatives on Friday, as "shameful" and his foreign secretary, Luis Ernesto Derbez, said Monday the wall was "stupid." It's hard to underestimate the ill-feeling the proposal has generated in Mexico, where editorial pages are dominated by cartoons of Uncle Sam putting up walls bearing anti-Mexican messages.
I'd love to get my hands on some of those cartoons. I'd wallpaper this entire blog with them. Many Mexicans, especially those who have spent time working in the U.S., feel the proposal is a slap in the face to those who work hard and contribute to the U.S. economy. WTF?????? What is contributed by ILLEGALS? Cheap labor? How about what you take away: Free health care, no taxes, free education, and usually a cash only job where wages are not reported, AND, American dollars that are sent out of the country. Last estimate I read says California (Los Angeles area specifically) has a $2 billion underground economy with ILLEGALS, and not one cent of it goes to any social service: such as hospitals, general revenue, or education. Does anyone else see something wrong with this besides me? "When people heard this, it worried everybody, because this will affect everybody in some way, and their families," Robledo said. "They were incredulous. How could they do this, propose something like this?" It's called the law you ignorant moron! Robledo, whose son and mother are U.S. citizens, predicted the measure "would unleash conflict within the United States" as small businesses fail for lack of workers. Good. As stated above, it's the law already. Too many companies are breaking it without regard to who the paychecks are going to, or what becomes of that money once it slips beneath the table. He said many Mexicans felt betrayed by the anti-immigrant sentiment. "We learned to believe in the United States. We have a binational life," he said of Zacatecas, a state that has been sending migrants north for more than a century. "It isn't just a feeling of rejection. It's against what we see as part of our life, our culture, our territory." The problem with this statement is you (ILLEGALS) don't make America your life. You don't make America your culture. And it sure as hell is not your territory. If you come here (legally) and learn the language, customs, and affairs of America, and make them your own, I have no problems with you. But when you expect me to adapt to suit your needs, you can think again. If I move to Japan, I would never expect the Japanese to pander to my needs. But that's exactly what is happening here. It's a culture clash. Either we win, or we will have no country. The government is scrambling to fight on two fronts. On Monday, it announced it had hired Allyn & Company, a Dallas-based public relations company to help improve Mexico's image and stem the immigration backlash. "If people in the U.S. and Canada had an accurate view of the success of democracy, political stability and economic prosperity in Mexico, it would improve their views on specific bilateral issues like immigration and border security," Rob Allyn, president of the PR firm, told The Associated Press Tuesday. Just go back and read the link on Allyn above. Jose Luis Soberanes, head of the government's National Human Rights Commission, suggested Mexico go further. "I would expect more energetic reactions from our authorities," Soberanes told local media. "It's preferable to have a more demanding government, more confrontation with the United States." It's a shame we've let it go this far. Listening to the guy above, you'd think America should allow anyone and everyone to enter unchecked. The sense of dread connected with the measures is hardly restricted to Mexico. Immigrant advocacy and aid groups in the United States are worried about provisions of the House bill that upgrade unlawful presence in the United States from a civil offense to a felony. That's what it should be. You're trespassing on foreign soil. Better yet, you should be shot on sight if you are here without permission. "This is a sad foreshadowing," said immigrants rights activist Kathryn Rodriguez of the Derechos Humanos coalition in Tucson, Ariz. She fears the bill could expose those who help sick or dying migrants to criminal prosecution. And they should be! They are breaking the law. Want to help, call the police or INS, and have them removed from the country. The House bill, passed on a 239-182 vote, would also enlist military and local law enforcement to help stop illegal entrants and require employers to verify the legal status of their workers. There's a thought... Enforcing the law. What a unique concept. Mexicans are outraged by the proposed measures, especially the extension of the border wall, which many liken to the Berlin Wall. Some are urging their government to fight it fiercely.
"Our president should oppose that wall and make them stop it, at all costs," said Martin Vazquez, 26, at the Mexico City airport as he returned from his job as a hotel worker in Las Vegas. "More than just insulting, it's terrible."
The difference is the Berlin Wall was designed to keep citizens in.
No doubt he'll be sneaking back across the border on foot once the Christmas holiday is over. Look, you can call me a racist all you want, but what is said above by the ILLEGALS, and those who support them, is wrong. Think about it before you start screaming at me. Either you live by the law, or you don't. Those quoted above fail to grasp this simple idea. Thank God we have a congress finally showing they have the 'nads to approve some kind of deterrent to stop, or at least stem the stream of bodies flowing here ILLEGALLY. ____ Associated Press reporter Victor Bermudez contributed to this report from Mexico City.
Monday, December 19, 2005
Follow-Up To The Story Below: Schwarzenegger Proves He Has A Pair
SACRAMENTO - Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Monday told officials in his hometown in Austria to remove his name from a sports stadium and stop using his name to promote the city. "In all likelihood, during my term as governor, I will have to make similar and equally difficult decisions," Schwarzenegger said in the letter. "In order to spare the responsible politicians of the city of Graz further concern, I withdraw from them as of this day the right to use my name in association with the Liebenauer Stadium." Schwarzenegger also said he would no longer permit the use of his name "to advertise or promote the city of Graz in any way."
Funny... here's someone who seems to get it. When you come to America and become a citizen, you take an oath. That oath is the following: I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God. In acknowledgement whereof I have hereunto affixed my signature. I like the fact that Arnold slapped down his old town, not out of disrespect, but because he is a governor that will not allow old-country opinion to run his state You may not like him as an actor, or a politician, but in my opinion he handled this situation like a gentleman, and most importantly, an American.
Thursday, December 15, 2005
Money For The Stripper
Shhhhh.... Don't Tell The Democrats
The article can be found Here.
A few tidbits include: WASHINGTON -- A record plunge in the cost of gasoline pushed consumer prices down by the largest amount in 56 years in November while industrial production posted a solid gain. and The Labor Department reported that its closely watched Consumer Price Index dropped by 0.6 percent last month, the biggest decline since a 0.9 percent fall in July 1949. So, while Democrats bemoan the economy, just remember the above statistics, and the fact that when industrial production is up (more people work), and prices stay down (more people spend), it means the economy is rocking along. I know it will happen, so I'll wait for the game to come to me. Who will be the first to say: "But what about outsourcing?" "Layoffs?" or my favorite "Corporate Fat-Cats with million dollar salaries thanks to the evil Bush cabal?" Like I said, I'll wait. If and when someone comes around wanting to discuss economic models and basic Business 101 principles, I'll talk to you then.
Wednesday, December 14, 2005
Truth
It's Not Stealing... It's Borrowing... Ok, It's Stealing.
Tuesday, December 13, 2005
The Perfect Christmas Gift
Monday, December 12, 2005
"I Took A Poo In The Woods..."
Friday, December 09, 2005
From The "We Need A Fence" Department
If You Ever Wondered
Wednesday, December 07, 2005
Do You Also Have 200 Words To Describe Melting Ice?
Here and here, and this one even proposes it may be gases coming from ocean volcanoes that are causing an upswing in temperature
From the first site linked above: The major climatic affect that volcanoes have is due to the aerosol particles that are exploded into the troposphere by large eruptions. Even though there are many more small eruptions, unless the aerosols (and ash) makes it out of the troposphere to the stratosphere, it will be rained or snowed out in a short time. The aerosols that do reach the stratosphere can have two effects. If they are larger than about 2 microns, they allow incoming solar radiation to reach the Earth's surface but block outgoing heat radiation--this will contribute to global warming. On the other hand, if the aerosols are smaller than about 2 microns, they tend to block the incoming solar radiation--leading to global cooling. Pinatubo, for example, caused about a 1/2 degree C cooling of the Earth for the year or so following its big 1991 eruption. Here's the breakdown: Nobody knows conclusively. So someone tell Nuk Nuk to go climb back in his igloo.Teetering On The Stairs..... And Falling
Others have also voiced a strange position that this war should not be viewed as one that can be won or lost. WTF? I say a little prayer every night thanking God we didn't have congressmen that wanted to bail during the long stretch of WW2. Because you know, we would not be able to win against facism, would we? It could be a tie, right? Morons. The real concern here is not their opposition to the war or policy. I have no problem with it if that is their honest view. The problem I see is their lack of confidence (read: backbone) when it comes to a fight that requires time. We're talking less than 4 years on a war that may take decades, and people want these spineless monkeys as US leaders? That frightens me. There have been many wars in the past that were not popular, but this is the first time (that I can find) opposition leaders have come out in force, in such a short period of time, to derail the war effort. It is the belief of this writer that it will hurt them in the long run. There have always been protestors, that's not new, but the politicians have lost their little minds with some newsbites they are allowing to escape their mouths. Have the dems (and some republicans) forgotten that some wars are not won in a few days, or a year? It was nice to wrap up Desert Storm, Grenada, and a few others over a couple of weekends, but that's not the norm. I don't understand why that fails to sink into their heads, and they suddenly align themselves with the "we can't win, we shouldn't win" crowd. Which brings me to my final point: The war is winnable, and justifiable, but nobody is reporting that, are they? The adage: If it bleeds, it leads takes center stage on the evening news. It's sad that there are few views of the good that is coming to Iraq. Wall Street Journal Opinion Under the sub-heading of: "Why aren't the media telling the whole story about Iraq?"
By : Don Rumsfeld
I love it when liberal panties get in a wad over what he says. What a guy.
(About this picture: If only) A few points: I don't put much faith in polls. Never have. But If this poll is somewhat correct, the dichotomy between the two views of a winnable (Republican) war, or a we will continue to lose (Democratic) war shows a vast gulf between the two parties that may never be spanned again. The following poll is from the Pew Research Center, and asked opinion leaders in the United States their views of the prospects for a stable democracy in Iraq. From the story: Here were some of the results: 63% of people in the news media thought the enterprise would fail. So did 71% of people in the foreign affairs establishment and 71% in academic settings or think tanks. Interestingly, opinion leaders from the U.S. military are optimistic about Iraq by a margin of 64% to 32%. And so is the American public, by a margin of 56% to 37%. Why does it not surprise me that the brainiacs, and those of the liberal arts bent believe failure is in the cards for Iraq? It seems their life outside of the academic and journalistic world, is a letdown compared to those in other industries. It could be they have to deal with facts, and differing opinion instead of constant reinforcement of beliefs. So, they hide in their classrooms and behind their editorial staff, fomulating ideas that are soundly disproved when shown the light of reasoning. The final statements are the most important, and Democrats could learn a few things about restoring confidence in them as a party with Rumsfeld's words below. First, here's my advice: Grow a pair, and stop sounding like a whining schoolgirl with a frog dropped down her blouse. Now, here's some ending thoughts from Rumsfeld: Quitting is not a strategy. Quitting is an invitation to more attacks and more terrorist violence here at home. This is not just an hypothesis. The U.S. withdrawal from Somalia emboldened Osama bin Laden in the 1990s. We know this. He has said so. The message retreat in Iraq would send to the free people of Iraq and to moderate Muslim reformers throughout the region would be that they can't count on America. The message it would send to our enemies would be: that if America will not defend itself against terrorists in Iraq, it will not defend itself against terrorists anywhere. What is needed is resolve, not retreat; courage, not concession. Rather than thinking in terms of an exit strategy, we should be focused on a strategy for success. The president's strategy focuses on progress on the political, economic, and security tracks. You can read that strategy paper on the White House's Web site.Maybe Captain Capitulation could learn something from this article too. Then again, he believes our troops are terrorists, so maybe not.
Read the rest of Rumsfeld at the link above.Tuesday, December 06, 2005
Narf!!!
Monday, December 05, 2005
It's Called PsyOps For A Reason
"All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must seem inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near. Hold out baits to entice the enemy. Feign disorder, and crush him." - Sun Tzu, the Art of War Two great websites on the history and uses of PsyOp warfare can be found here and here. The idea has always been about deception and most importantly winning. As usual, the MSM sees it differently. Recently the MSM "uncovered" a story where American intelligence paid Iraqi newspapers to print planted news. And the problem here is....What? Apparently the MSM has forgotten (not that I believe they ever cared) who and what we are fighting for, or even if we win or lose. By the way, what do they think the VOA (Voice of America) does? Isn't it slanted just a tad toward being favorable to American views? The forgetfulness of the MSM, I think, is most evident on Sunday mornings. For the most part, Sunday morning talk shows are mind numbing affairs. Usually it's nothing more than talking heads (from both sides of politics) spouting off about useless matters. There was a time when shows like these were useful: That would be 1970. But thanks to cable news and the internet, I get more information now in one hour surfing (chanel and web) then when I filled up for the week on Sunday with David Brinkley, Charles Kuralt, and The McLaughlin Group. Every once and awhile you stumble across someone who makes me question the "Sunday talkies are crap" stance. In this case, it's John McCain. I cringe to think I'm quoting John McCain about the whole PsyOp thing, but he nails it on the head: Tim Russert, of Meet The Press, asked McCain: "But here we are trying to teach democracy and freedom of the press and the lack of state-sponsored censorship, if you will, and we're paying Iraqis to print articles?" McCain shot back (rather brilliantly, I might add): "If these are accurate stories then we should make every effort to get them out. We are in a propaganda war. This is a war for the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people as well." Russert, apparently not getting the answer he wanted asked again: "But in principle you have no problem paying the Iraqis?" And McCain repeated for the either deaf, slightly retarded, or braindead Timmy (Timmay!) Russert, "If that's the standard procedure in Iraq - if that's what you need to do to get a story in one of these newspapers . . . . then I'm not terribly offended by it." The MSM has become a farce over the years. With alternative sources of news, it doesn't take a genius to see that. It also doesn't take much digging to come up with American news manipulation stories designed to harm instead of promote the good. Here's a few of the ones I found: The Washington Post - which won a Pulitzer Prize for its series on Little Jimmy, the 8-year-old heroin addict - which the paper had to give back once star Post reporter Janet Cooke admitted she'd faked the whole story. NBC aired video of an exploding GM truck gas tank - which was faked by their reporters. CBS has not yet discovered just who it was who forged President Bush's National Guard records - before Dan Rather committed professional suicide by putting them in the air. In a deliciously ironic twist of fate, shortly before airing a segment aimed at embarrassing the Bush administration by suggesting that it had staged a video conversation between the president and soldiers in Iraq, the Today show was caught staging . . . a video stunt. What bothers me about the story planting is not that we are doing it, but the White House reaction. They are playing this as a wrong that will be corrected. Why anyone would want to shut down something that would benefit America is beyond the grasp of my tiny conservative caveman brain. At least the plus side of the story is this: It's a non story. It means nothing to the average American. It only became a story because screeching, liberal news monkeys, decide to publish something that may or may not be true, but may also harm our troops. But, there's nothing new about that, is there? Story #2: The following cracks me up a bit. This is quite possibly the finest example of PsyOps. A poem in a school textbook has been removed by embarrassed education officials in Pakistan after it was found that the first letters of each line spelt out "President George W Bush." The 20-line anonymous poem, The Leader, lists the qualities of "a man who will do what he must" and bears a passing resemblance to Rudyard Kipling's If. Here's the poem. A little sappy, but still funny. THE LEADER by anonymous Patient and steadfast by all he must bear, Ready to accept every challenge with care. Easy in manner, yet solid as steel, Strong in his faith, refreshingly real, Isn't afraid to propose what is bold, Doesn't conform to the usual mold, Eyes that have foresight,for hindsight won't do, Never back down when he sees what is true, Tells it all straight, and means it all too, Going forward and knowing he's right, Even when doubted for why he would fight, Over and over he makes his case clear, Reaching to touch the ones who won't hear, Growing in strength, he won't be unnerved, Ever assuring he'll stand by his word, Wanting the world to join his firm stand, Bracing for war, but praying for peace, Using his power so evil will cease: So much a leader and worthy of trust, Here stands a man that will do what he must. I blame Karl Rove for this one. I can see him sitting awake at 3 in the morning, wanting to finish the poem, and thinking: "What rhymes with unnerved?" Then saying "Screw it. Word will work." and finishing off the remaining six stanzas. Pure genius!